What we look for
Code vulnerabilities we hunt for
Finding a vulnerability in source is cheaper than finding it in production. We trace injection, authentication, and logic flaws to the exact lines of code that cause them.
Injection & Input Handling
Unsafe use of untrusted input traced directly to the vulnerable code.
We test for
- SQL and command injection
- Unsafe deserialization
- Path traversal
- Input validation gaps
Authentication & Authorization
Access-control and identity logic flaws visible at the source.
We test for
- Broken access-control checks
- Session and token handling
- Privilege and role logic
- Insecure direct references
Cryptography & Secrets
Weak cryptography and mishandled secrets baked into the codebase.
We test for
- Weak or custom algorithms
- Hardcoded secrets and keys
- Insecure randomness
- Improper key handling
Dependencies & Configuration
Risk introduced by third-party code and insecure defaults.
We test for
- Vulnerable dependencies
- Supply-chain risk
- Insecure default configuration
- Debug and verbose settings
How it works
How your engagement runs
From scope through the final retest, your team stays in the loop at every step,
with findings tracked live in our platform.
- 01
Scope & kickoff
Targets, roles, and rules of engagement defined in writing, with a fixed scope and timeline.
- 02
Testing goes live
Findings post to your live platform dashboard the moment our testers confirm them.
- 03
Track remediation
Follow every finding from open to fixed, with severity, evidence, and status in one place.
- 04
Report & retest
Executive and technical reports land, then request a free retest in one click.
Resources
Field notes from the offensive side
Offense in Depth in Red Team Operations
Defense in depth layers protection. Offense in depth layers attack paths so a red team still reaches its objective when one route fails. Here is how it works.
Security Between Penetration Tests
An annual pentest covers two weeks and leaves fifty uncovered. Here is how to secure the rest of the year without waiting for the next scheduled engagement.
The Limits of AI in Penetration Testing
AI is changing penetration testing, but it will not replace human testers. Here is what it does well, where it falls short, and why judgment still wins.
Want to see a real report first?
Request a redacted sample report before you scope an engagement.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
What teams most often ask before
scoping source code review.
01How is a source code review different from a penetration test?
A penetration test attacks the running application from the outside. A source code review examines the code itself, catching insecure patterns, logic flaws, and vulnerabilities at their root, including issues that are hard to reach from the outside. The two are complementary.
02Do you use automated tools or manual review?
Both. We use AI-assisted static analysis to cover ground quickly, then a human reviewer verifies every flagged finding and hunts for the logic and design flaws that tools miss, so you get context and confirmed results rather than raw scanner output.
03What languages do you review?
We review the major web, mobile, and backend languages and frameworks. Share your stack during scoping and we will confirm coverage.
Ready to test your defenses?
Talk to our team about scoping source code review.
Prefer the full scoping questionnaire?Get a Fixed-Scope Quote
Tell us what you need tested. We reply within one business day.
Thanks, we've received your message.
We'll be in touch shortly.